For
anybody with a connection to the financial world, it would have been impossible
to miss the scandal regarding HSBC Switzerland recently. Although not really a
new development, it is perhaps since a month now that the SwissLeaks has become
public knowledge with the data stolen by an IT staff member of HSBC back in
2008 has been made public. The data provided is rather complete, containing
full details of some 100’000 clients but also much of the call and meeting
reports registered by Relationship Managers for the contact they had with these
clients. The media has divulged some of this, mostly trying to single out
famous names in an attempt to further discredit the bank as well as the famous
clients. The fact that many of those names actually had not done anything
wrong, other than seeking financial advice from a renowned private bank, is
something which has totally been omitted from the press.
No
matter. What I wanted to write about today is how the public and the
governments are seeing whistle blowers differently depending on the information
they are divulging. There is a considerable hypocrisy going on here, and
unfortunately not many people are picking up on this due to the way the media
in general is presenting things. We are all very manipulated by the media, even
if we don’t realize it.
For
starters, we have whistle blowers such as Hervé Falciani and Bradley
Birkenfeld. Falciani, the IT employee behind the leak from HSBC, is being
heralded as a hero by much of the world’s media as well as many governments.
Birkenfeld was ultimately rewarded with USD 104 million for his involvement in
denouncing the illicit practices of UBS, that evil Swiss bank. There are
some other examples such as Heinrich Kieber who received EUR 4.2 million from
German for the files he stole from a bank in Liechtenstein.
All
of these whistle blowers have one thing in common; they have been attacking
Swiss and Liechtenstein banks as well as wealthy individuals. Governments are
putting these people on a podium because they dared to speak out against those
evil banks. The fact that much of the information provided is actually that of
clients having fully legitimate and declared assets with banks that were chosen
because of their professional expertise as well as confidentiality is beside
the point.
At
the same time, we have some other whistle blowers that are instead being
treated as criminals and traitors, having to live life in hiding or in prison.
These are people like Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning.
Instead of receiving the same sort of heroes greeting, they are chased as
dangerous criminals or as is the case for Manning serving 35 years in prison.
What do they have in common? Well, these have all attacked governments and
their illicit practices.
We
can conclude here that the same country that gave Birkenfeld USD 104 million
for his whistleblowing has sentenced Manning to 35 years in prison for his. So,
if you are going to be a whistleblower, be careful about who you are blowing
the whistle on. The fact that this sort of defeats the purpose of
whistleblowers I suppose is beside the point. At least in the mind of some…
No comments:
Post a Comment